Disclosure and Reporting

Subscribe to Disclosure and Reporting via RSS

On June 2, 2026, the SEC published a Draft Strategic Plan for fiscal years 2026 through 2030 and opened it for public comment through July 2, 2026. A strategic plan does not change any rule on its own, but it tells public companies where the agency is headed and which initiatives the Chairman intends to push forward. Not surprisingly, this one signals a clear focus on “modernizing and simplifying disclosure practices,” “enabling new capital-raising pathways,” and returning the SEC’s “enforcement approach to Congress’ original intent.”

Continue Reading The SEC’s Draft Strategic Plan: A Roadmap for Modernized Disclosure and Capital Formation

Federal securities law does not use a single, uniform definition of “officer.” Instead, several overlapping definitions determine who qualifies as an officer for different regulatory purposes, each carrying its own set of individual-specific disclosure consequences. For public companies and their counsel, correctly classifying officers across these frameworks is essential to ensuring compliance with SEC filing requirements. Additionally, for prospective officers themselves, understanding how these definitions apply is critical to appreciating the scope of personal information that will become publicly available upon assuming their roles.

Continue Reading SEC Officer Definitions: A Quick Reference

On May 20, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a new exemptive order (Release No. 34-105517) adding Australia, India, and Singapore to the list of “Qualifying Jurisdictions.” Directors and officers of foreign private issuers (“FPIs”) incorporated in these jurisdictions may, subject to specified conditions, be exempt from the Section 16(a) reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The new order builds directly on, and incorporates the conditions of, the SEC’s March 5, 2026 order that we addressed in our prior alert memo, which we encourage readers to consult for background on the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act (“HFIAA”) framework and the detailed conditions of the relief.

Continue Reading Section 16(a) Reporting: SEC Expands Exemptive Relief to Additional Foreign Private Issuer Jurisdictions

On May 19, 2026, the SEC proposed amendments that would collapse the current five overlapping filer categories into just two (large accelerated filer and non-accelerated filer) and raise the large accelerated filer public float threshold from $700 million to $2 billion. The amendments would also extend the scaled disclosure accommodations now reserved for smaller reporting companies and emerging growth companies to an estimated 81% of reporting companies. Every newly public company would also receive a guaranteed five-year on-ramp during which large accelerated filer status cannot attach. The SEC has deliberately limited the proposal’s reach over foreign private issuers, pending the broader review of the FPI framework initiated by its June 2025 concept release.

Continue Reading SEC Proposes Simplified Filer Status Framework and Expanded Disclosure Relief

On May 19, 2026, the SEC proposed amendments in a “Registered Offering Reform” package that would make it significantly easier for public companies to raise capital through registered offerings of securities. The proposed rules would broaden Form S‑3 shelf eligibility to a much larger set of issuers by, most notably, eliminating the current one-year seasoning requirement and the transaction requirements (including the $75 million public float threshold). Among other things, this means that newly public companies of any size will now be S-3 eligible immediately after their IPOs.

Continue Reading SEC Proposes Registered Offering Reform: Shelf Access Immediately After IPO and Regardless of Size of Public Float, Expanded WKSI-Like Benefits, and Form S-1 Modernization

In March 2026, the Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued and revised several Corporate Finance Interpretations (CFIs), formerly called Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, addressing capital markets transactions and corporate practices. This post summarizes Corp Fin’s updated guidance on “ineligible issuer” status, Section 16 reporting obligations, Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) account management following corporate reorganizations, smaller reporting company (SRC) status, and Form S-3 baby shelf applicability to certain At-the-Market (ATM) offerings. Corp Fin also released CFI guidance on Securities Act Rule 701 and asset-backed securities topics. For revised or withdrawn questions, click through to see the SEC’s redline.

Continue Reading SEC Updates CFI Guidance: March 2026 Roundup

In January and February 2026, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued, revised, and withdrew several C&DIs addressing corporate transactions and capital markets practices. The full set of January and February releases is linked below:

Continue Reading SEC Updates C&DI Guidance: January and February 2026 Roundup – Part 3

In January and February 2026, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued, revised, and withdrew several C&DIs addressing corporate transactions and capital markets practices. The full set of January and February releases is linked below:

Continue Reading SEC Updates C&DI Guidance: January and February 2026 Roundup – Part 2

In January and February 2026, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued, revised, and withdrew several C&DIs addressing corporate transactions and capital markets practices. The full set of January and February releases is linked below:

Continue Reading SEC Updates C&DI Guidance: January and February 2026 Roundup – Part 1

Board diversity disclosure is undergoing a meaningful recalibration. After years of increasing pressure by shareholders and other stakeholders to increase the number of women and underrepresented minorities on boards and provide robust disclosure of board demographic information, the framework is now shifting. Following the U.S. Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit’s December 2024 decision to strike down the rule requiring Nasdaq-listed companies to include board diversity disclosure in their proxy statements, the Trump Administration’s targeting of DEI programs, and the related pullback from the major proxy advisory firms and institutional investors in their stewardship principles and voting guidelines, companies are now re-assessing how they define and describe the diversity of directors serving on their boards in their proxy statements. While companies continue to emphasize that their boards include directors with diverse skills, backgrounds, experiences and viewpoints, proxy statement disclosure increasingly frames diversity in broader terms instead of focusing primarily on protected classes. 

Continue Reading Reframing Board Diversity Disclosure in 2026 Proxy Statements