Proxy Rules

Subscribe to Proxy Rules via RSS

On July 16, 2026, the SEC proposed Regulation E-Delivery, which would allow companies to make electronic delivery the default option on a go-forward basis for satisfying delivery obligations under the federal securities laws, including for proxy materials, so long as the recipient has provided an electronic address. Today the presumption runs the other way: delivery is on paper unless the recipient opts in to e-delivery. The proposal would flip that presumption, subject to conditions, while preserving each recipient’s right to opt out and receive paper for free.

Continue Reading SEC Proposes E-Delivery as the New Default for Proxy Materials and Other Disclosures

On July 9, the Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) issued three new Corporation Finance Interpretations (CFIs) addressing disclosure obligations under Schedules 13D and 14A. The guidance targets a specific but increasingly common activism structure: special-purpose vehicles that raise capital from investors to buy a single issuer’s securities and conduct an activism or proxy campaign. Activists who form these vehicles must now name the underlying investors in their 13D and contested proxy filings.

Continue Reading SEC Staff Issues Guidance on Disclosure Obligations for Activist Fund Structures Under Schedules 13D and 14A

The SEC’s 2026 rulemaking agenda and statement of regulatory priorities recently went public as part of the federal governments overall 2026 Regulatory Plan. The agenda lists 38 potential SEC rulemakings and reflects Chairman Atkins’s broadly deregulatory orientation, with proposals aimed at: cutting compliance burdens, facilitating capital formation, revitalizing public markets to “Make IPOs Great Again,” widening retail access to private markets, and building a crypto framework. As expected, many of the pending proposals are anticipated to reshape the disclosure, proxy, capital-raising, and governance rules that public companies live by.

Continue Reading SEC Publishes Its 2026 Rulemaking Agenda

Federal securities law does not use a single, uniform definition of “officer.” Instead, several overlapping definitions determine who qualifies as an officer for different regulatory purposes, each carrying its own set of individual-specific disclosure consequences. For public companies and their counsel, correctly classifying officers across these frameworks is essential to ensuring compliance with SEC filing requirements. Additionally, for prospective officers themselves, understanding how these definitions apply is critical to appreciating the scope of personal information that will become publicly available upon assuming their roles.

Continue Reading SEC Officer Definitions: A Quick Reference

On April 8, 2026, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a no-action letter addressing a structural conflict that arises for companies incorporated in the Netherlands, listed on a U.S. exchange, but without foreign private issuer (FPI) status, leaving them fully subject to U.S. domestic proxy rules under Regulation 14A. The conflict stems from a timing mismatch: Dutch law fixes the record date at 28 days before a shareholder meeting, while Rule 14a-16(a) requires distributing the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials at least 40 calendar days out. A company could technically satisfy U.S. proxy rules by abandoning notice and access and instead mailing full printed sets of proxy materials, but for a company with a large, dispersed shareholder base, that approach is far more expensive and impractical. The Division of Corporation Finance granted relief so long as the company (i) files its definitive proxy statement and annual report with the SEC and posts them on its website at least 40 days before the meeting; (ii) issues a press release announcing the availability of materials, the planned notice distribution date, and how shareholders can request paper copies; and (iii) distributes notice cards within five business days after the record date. This framework for conditioned relief mirrors the framework that the Division of Corporation Finance applied in a substantially similar no-action letter to another Dutch-incorporated, U.S.-listed company without FPI status in April 2025. These letters continue a pattern of Division relief addressing home-country/U.S. proxy rule conflicts. In a January 2014 no-action letter, the Division of Corporation Finance granted no-action relief to a Curaçao-incorporated, U.S.-listed company without FPI status that permitted the company to bypass the preliminary proxy filing requirement under Rule 14a-6(a) for routine shareholder votes that Curaçao law mandated.

Continue Reading SEC No-Action Relief Offers a Roadmap for Foreign-Incorporated Companies Caught Between Home-Country Law and U.S. Proxy Rules

In January and February 2026, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued, revised, and withdrew several C&DIs addressing corporate transactions and capital markets practices. The full set of January and February releases is linked below:

Continue Reading SEC Updates C&DI Guidance: January and February 2026 Roundup – Part 3

In January and February 2026, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued, revised, and withdrew several C&DIs addressing corporate transactions and capital markets practices. The full set of January and February releases is linked below:

Continue Reading SEC Updates C&DI Guidance: January and February 2026 Roundup – Part 2

In January and February 2026, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued, revised, and withdrew several C&DIs addressing corporate transactions and capital markets practices. The full set of January and February releases is linked below:

Continue Reading SEC Updates C&DI Guidance: January and February 2026 Roundup – Part 1

Board diversity disclosure is undergoing a meaningful recalibration. After years of increasing pressure by shareholders and other stakeholders to increase the number of women and underrepresented minorities on boards and provide robust disclosure of board demographic information, the framework is now shifting. Following the U.S. Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit’s December 2024 decision to strike down the rule requiring Nasdaq-listed companies to include board diversity disclosure in their proxy statements, the Trump Administration’s targeting of DEI programs, and the related pullback from the major proxy advisory firms and institutional investors in their stewardship principles and voting guidelines, companies are now re-assessing how they define and describe the diversity of directors serving on their boards in their proxy statements. While companies continue to emphasize that their boards include directors with diverse skills, backgrounds, experiences and viewpoints, proxy statement disclosure increasingly frames diversity in broader terms instead of focusing primarily on protected classes. 

Continue Reading Reframing Board Diversity Disclosure in 2026 Proxy Statements

2026 promises to be a year that will demand both agility and strategic foresight from boards of directors and management as they navigate unprecedented challenges.

Drawing on insights from colleagues across Cleary Gottlieb’s global offices, our 2026 edition of Selected Issues for Boards of Directors examines the critical issues that dominated boardroom discussions in 2025 and identifies the emerging trends that will shape board agendas in the year ahead.

Continue Reading Selected Issues for Boards of Directors in 2026