SEC Guidance

Subscribe to SEC Guidance via RSS

Yesterday, the Securities and Exchange Commission rescinded its so-called “gag rule,” which for fifty years had prohibited a settling defendant from publicly denying the allegations in a settled SEC Enforcement action.[1] The policy shift has received significant media attention, but we believe it will have little effect on the experience of most individuals and entities facing SEC investigation, many of whom are keen to resolve an investigation and move on without drawing additional attention to themselves. But the change does create potential pitfalls for those trying to resolve SEC investigations, and heightens the need to think strategically when negotiating resolutions and pursuing public denials of wrongdoing. We have investigated, settled, and litigated numerous SEC enforcement investigations, both on behalf of the agency and in private practice. Outlined below are some of the potential knock-on effects we see from this policy change.

Continue Reading Deny With Care: SEC Rescinds Settlement “Gag Rule,” Creating Risks and Opportunities for Settling Defendants

The Securities and Exchange Commission recently cut the minimum time required for certain equity tender offers in half. Historically, federal rules mandated that such offers remain open for at least 20 business days. Now, an April 16, 2026 exemptive order from the Division of Corporation Finance allows market participants to conclude qualifying cash tender offers in just 10 business days. While this new relief applies exclusively to equity securities, it signals a pragmatic shift at the SEC and suggests market participants may see similar relief formalized for debt tender offers down the road.

Continue Reading SEC Reduces Minimum Equity Tender Offer Period to 10 Business Days

On April 8, 2026, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a no-action letter addressing a structural conflict that arises for companies incorporated in the Netherlands, listed on a U.S. exchange, but without foreign private issuer (FPI) status, leaving them fully subject to U.S. domestic proxy rules under Regulation 14A. The conflict stems from a timing mismatch: Dutch law fixes the record date at 28 days before a shareholder meeting, while Rule 14a-16(a) requires distributing the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials at least 40 calendar days out. A company could technically satisfy U.S. proxy rules by abandoning notice and access and instead mailing full printed sets of proxy materials, but for a company with a large, dispersed shareholder base, that approach is far more expensive and impractical. The Division of Corporation Finance granted relief so long as the company (i) files its definitive proxy statement and annual report with the SEC and posts them on its website at least 40 days before the meeting; (ii) issues a press release announcing the availability of materials, the planned notice distribution date, and how shareholders can request paper copies; and (iii) distributes notice cards within five business days after the record date. This framework for conditioned relief mirrors the framework that the Division of Corporation Finance applied in a substantially similar no-action letter to another Dutch-incorporated, U.S.-listed company without FPI status in April 2025. These letters continue a pattern of Division relief addressing home-country/U.S. proxy rule conflicts. In a January 2014 no-action letter, the Division of Corporation Finance granted no-action relief to a Curaçao-incorporated, U.S.-listed company without FPI status that permitted the company to bypass the preliminary proxy filing requirement under Rule 14a-6(a) for routine shareholder votes that Curaçao law mandated.

Continue Reading SEC No-Action Relief Offers a Roadmap for Foreign-Incorporated Companies Caught Between Home-Country Law and U.S. Proxy Rules

In March 2026, the Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued and revised several Corporate Finance Interpretations (CFIs), formerly called Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations, addressing capital markets transactions and corporate practices. This post summarizes Corp Fin’s updated guidance on “ineligible issuer” status, Section 16 reporting obligations, Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) account management following corporate reorganizations, smaller reporting company (SRC) status, and Form S-3 baby shelf applicability to certain At-the-Market (ATM) offerings. Corp Fin also released CFI guidance on Securities Act Rule 701 and asset-backed securities topics. For revised or withdrawn questions, click through to see the SEC’s redline.

Continue Reading SEC Updates CFI Guidance: March 2026 Roundup

In January and February 2026, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued, revised, and withdrew several C&DIs addressing corporate transactions and capital markets practices. The full set of January and February releases is linked below:

Continue Reading SEC Updates C&DI Guidance: January and February 2026 Roundup – Part 3

In January and February 2026, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued, revised, and withdrew several C&DIs addressing corporate transactions and capital markets practices. The full set of January and February releases is linked below:

Continue Reading SEC Updates C&DI Guidance: January and February 2026 Roundup – Part 2

In January and February 2026, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued, revised, and withdrew several C&DIs addressing corporate transactions and capital markets practices. The full set of January and February releases is linked below:

Continue Reading SEC Updates C&DI Guidance: January and February 2026 Roundup – Part 1

On January 28, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Division of Corporation Finance, Division of Investment Management, and Division of Trading and Markets (the “Divisions”) published a joint statement providing taxonomies for tokenized securities (the “Guidance”).[1] The Guidance is intended to assist market participants active in tokenized products to ensure compliance with federal securities laws.

Continue Reading SEC Staff Issues Guidance on Tokenized Security Taxonomies

I. Introduction

In November 2025, the Division of Corporate Finance (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced that it would no longer provide substantive responses to most no-action requests for shareholder proposals during this proxy season. Since this announcement (the “Announcement”), public companies have found themselves in uncharted territory. While companies may request a response from the Staff if they provide an unqualified representation that the company has a reasonable basis to exclude the proposal under Rule 14a-8, the Staff will only issue a no-action response based on that unqualified representation, and not based on any independent analysis of the merits of the arguments presented. Without the added assurance of the SEC’s substantive review, a number of companies have refreshed their strategic approach to no-action letters this proxy season. The exclusion notices[1] that have been submitted since the Announcement provide a glimpse into emerging trends regarding how companies and their legal counsel are interpreting the announcement and navigating this unguided landscape.

Continue Reading The NAL Landscape Post-SEC Announcement

2026 promises to be a year that will demand both agility and strategic foresight from boards of directors and management as they navigate unprecedented challenges.

Drawing on insights from colleagues across Cleary Gottlieb’s global offices, our 2026 edition of Selected Issues for Boards of Directors examines the critical issues that dominated boardroom discussions in 2025 and identifies the emerging trends that will shape board agendas in the year ahead.

Continue Reading Selected Issues for Boards of Directors in 2026